Today's blog includes articles on 1) a review of the Hobby Lobby decisions, 2) the ACA
accounts for economic growth and access to preventive services,
3) consequences of State Medicaid decisions, 4) keeping enrollees, and
5) 2015
premiums.
In the next blog issue I will be asking for advice on 3 projects I am engaged in.
The 8 Best Lines From Ginsburg's Dissent on the Hobby Lobby Contraception Decision
Ginsburg says it very well. Very disturbing decision on many levels.
Kaiser chart shows how the justices answered the four key questions in the case.
http://kaiserf.am/1qaQDuD
Hobby Lobby Ruling Creates Uncertainty About Contraceptive Mandate
Democrats Campaign Against High Court After Hobby Lobby Ruling
Our Economic Growth Is a Mystery. Obamacare Is the Reason.
Key briefing points:
- When determining 2015 health insurance
premiums, the largest drivers are changes in expectations about risk
pool composition, transitional policy for non-ACA compliant plans,
reduction of reinsurance program funds and medical trends, said Cori
Uccello. Other factors such as provider networks, market competition,
benefit packages, and administrative costs will also play a role, she
said.
- Premium rates between 2008 and 2010 increased an average
of 10 percent a year, according to a study that Jon Gruber cited. He
also noted that rates were highly variable across states, and that,
prior to ACA implementation, there was very little rate transparency.
Study available here: http://ow.ly/yENrA
- Market
rules changed significantly after ACA implementation and pricing
insurance products became more complicated, Elizabeth Hall stated.
Insurers will have more concrete information about demographics in 2015,
but obtaining a complete picture of medical claims and pharmaceutical
data for purposes of setting premiums will take several years. Pricing
in 2014 was based off of educated guesses, she said.
- The
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will now review all rate
increases unless the state already has an effective rate review program,
David Cusano said. Requirements for effective rate review programs
include receiving sufficient data about rate increases, considering at
least 15 factors in rate regulation, making rate filings readily
available, and providing a mechanism for public comments. As of April
2014, 45 States and the District of Columbia have effective rate review
programs, he said.
I’m Covered Stories: A Healthy Respect for a ‘Complicated’ Family
No comments:
Post a Comment